Celeron J1800 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1800 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1800 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1800

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium Dual-Core E2160 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium Dual-Core E2160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (820 vs 875).

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron J1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2160 better than Celeron J1800?

Yes. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $84 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J1800 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1800

The Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $72.

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J1800 and Pentium Dual-Core E2160 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.58 GHz on the Celeron J1800 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1800. The Celeron J1800 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1800 scores 820 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2160's 875 — a 6.5% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1800 vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160.

Feature	Celeron J1800	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.58 GHz+43%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.41 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	820	875+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J1800	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1800) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2160). The Celeron J1800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1800 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1800 rivals Pentium J2850.