Celeron J1800 vs E2-2000
Celeron J1800
E2-2000
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1800 is positioned at rank 750 and the E2-2000 is on rank 987, so the Celeron J1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1800
Performance Per Dollar E2-2000
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1800 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1800 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1800 and E2-2000
Celeron J1800
The Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $72.
E2-2000
The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron J1800 and E2-2000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.58 GHz on the Celeron J1800 versus 1.75 GHz on the E2-2000 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Celeron J1800. The Celeron J1800 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-2000 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1800 scores 820 against the E2-2000's 880 — a 7.1% lead for the E2-2000. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1800 vs 0 kB on the E2-2000.
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.58 GHz+47% | 1.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-45% | 40 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 820 | 880+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-2000 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1800) / not specified (E2-2000). The Celeron J1800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the E2-2000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1800 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1800 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1800 and E2-2000
