Celeron J1800 vs Celeron T3000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1800 vs Celeron T3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1800 vs Celeron T3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1800

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron T3000 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (820 vs 905).

Celeron T3000

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3000 better than Celeron J1800?

Yes. Celeron T3000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 10.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T3000 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J1800 vs Celeron T3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1800

The Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $72.

Celeron T3000

The Celeron T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J1800 and Celeron T3000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron J1800 is built on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J1800 scores 820 against the Celeron T3000's 905 — a 9.9% lead for the Celeron T3000. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron J1800	Celeron T3000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.58 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.41 GHz+34%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	—
PassMark	820	905+10%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3000 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J1800	Celeron T3000
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1800) / not specified (Celeron T3000). The Celeron J1800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Celeron T3000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1800 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1800 rivals Pentium J2850.