
Celeron J3060
Popular choices:

Pentium E2210
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Celeron J3060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium E2210 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 500).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium E2210.
Pentium E2210
2009Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J3060.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron J3060 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron J3060
2016Pentium E2210
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium E2210 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J3060.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 500).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium E2210.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron J3060 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium E2210 better than Celeron J3060?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3060 and Pentium E2210

Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060
The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E2210
Pentium E2210
The Pentium E2210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron J3060 and Pentium E2210 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron J3060 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3060 scores 1,015 against the Pentium E2210's 1,005 — a 1% lead for the Celeron J3060. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 300, a 40% lead for the Pentium E2210 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 370 vs 500 (29.9% advantage for the Pentium E2210). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3060 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium E2210.
| Feature | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.48 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Airmont (2016) | — |
| PassMark | 1,015 | 1,005 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 200 | 300+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 370 | 500+35% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E2210 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3060 versus DDR2 on the Pentium E2210 — the Celeron J3060 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J3060 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J3060) vs 0 (Pentium E2210) — the Celeron J3060 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron J3060) and Intel P35,Intel G33,Intel G31,Intel G41 (Pentium E2210).
| Feature | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+50% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060) vs false (Pentium E2210). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium E2210 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.
| Feature | Celeron J3060 | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | false |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop/NAS | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












