Celeron J3355
VS
Celeron 3855U

Celeron J3355 vs Celeron 3855U

Intel

Celeron J3355

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Celeron 3855U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3355 is positioned at rank 425 and the Celeron 3855U is on rank 193, so the Celeron 3855U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3355

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6218%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5876%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1285%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1018%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
503%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
458%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
458%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
453%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
441%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
435%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
433%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
429%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
98%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
98%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
97%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#425
Celeron J3355
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
100%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
99%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
96%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3855U

#181
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
362%
#182
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
357%
#183
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
328%
#184
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
326%
#185
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
323%
#187
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
312%
#188
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
299%
#189
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
299%
#190
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
291%
#193
Celeron 3855U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#194
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron J3355 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 3855U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron J3355Celeron 3855U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J3355Celeron 3855U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3355 and Celeron 3855U

Intel

Celeron J3355

The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Celeron 3855U

The Celeron 3855U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,215 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3355 and Celeron 3855U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 3855U — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J3355 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron J3355 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron 3855U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3355 scores 1,203 against the Celeron 3855U's 1,215 — a 1% lead for the Celeron 3855U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 361, a 21.9% lead for the Celeron J3355 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 850 vs 632 (29.4% advantage for the Celeron J3355). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3355 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3855U.

FeatureCeleron J3355Celeron 3855U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+56%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,203
1,215
Geekbench 6 Single
450+25%
361
Geekbench 6 Multi
850+34%
632
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3355 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3855U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3355 versus DDR4 2133 MHz on the Celeron 3855U — the Celeron 3855U supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3855U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3355) vs 10 (Celeron 3855U) — the Celeron 3855U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3355) and FCBGA1356 (Celeron 3855U).

FeatureCeleron J3355Celeron 3855U
Socket
FCBGA1296
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
10+67%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3355) vs true (Celeron 3855U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3355) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron 3855U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3355 targets Low Power, Celeron 3855U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205; Celeron 3855U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureCeleron J3355Celeron 3855U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Intel HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Low Power
Budget