Celeron J4125 vs Atom x5-Z8300

Celeron J4125

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2019

Atom x5-Z8300

4 Cores4 Thrd−WMax: 1.84 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron J4125

4 / 4

2,936

+0.1%

2,934

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8300

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

100%

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

99%

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

90%

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

90%

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

89%

#10

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

86%

#11

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

83%

#12

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

82%

#13

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

80%

#17

Core i3-350M

MSRP: $130|Avg: $10

74%

#18

Atom x5-E8000

MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A

73%

#19

Core 2 Duo T5900

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4125 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron J4125	Atom x5-Z8300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Atom x5-Z8300 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron J4125	Atom x5-Z8300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J4125 Benchmark Check

Atom x5-Z8300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4125 and Atom x5-Z8300

Celeron J4125

The Celeron J4125 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,936 points. Launch price was $107.

Atom x5-Z8300

The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4125 and Atom x5-Z8300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4125 versus 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 — a 37.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J4125 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Celeron J4125 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8300 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4125 scores 2,936 against the Atom x5-Z8300's 2,934 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J4125. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4125 vs 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300.

Feature	Celeron J4125	Atom x5-Z8300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+47%	1.84 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+39%	1.44 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,936	2,934

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4125 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x5-Z8300 uses UTFCBGA592 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4125 versus DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8300 — the Celeron J4125 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J4125 supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J4125) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8300). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4125) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8300) — the Celeron J4125 offers 5 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4125) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8300).

Feature	Celeron J4125	Atom x5-Z8300
Socket	FCBGA1090	UTFCBGA592
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400+79900%	DDR3L-RS 1600
Max RAM Capacity	8	2 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	6+500%	1

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4125) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8300). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4125) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8300) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4125 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.