Celeron J4125 vs Core i5-4300M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4125

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i5-4300M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4300M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,936 vs 2,960).

Core i5-4300M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $227 MSRP, while Celeron J4125 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4125 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300M better than Celeron J4125?

Yes. Core i5-4300M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4300M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4300M is the better buy right now. Core i5-4300M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $227 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4125 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4125

The Celeron J4125 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,936 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-4300M

The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4125 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4125 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4125 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 20% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron J4125 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4125 scores 2,936 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4300M. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4125 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4300M.

Feature	Celeron J4125	Core i5-4300M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,936	2,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4125 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4125	Core i5-4300M
Socket	FCBGA1090	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4125) / not specified (Core i5-4300M). The Celeron J4125 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i5-4300M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4125 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.