Celeron J4125 vs Core i3-10100Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i3-10100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i3-10100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4125

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i3-10100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-10100Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,918 vs 2,936).
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4125 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4125 better than Core i3-10100Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10100Y is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4125 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4125 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4125 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J4125 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4125 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4125 vs Core i3-10100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4125

The Celeron J4125 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,936 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-10100Y

The Core i3-10100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,918 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4125 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-10100Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4125 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4125 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10100Y — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100Y (base: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron J4125 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4125 scores 2,936 against the Core i3-10100Y's 2,918 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J4125. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron J4125	Core i3-10100Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,936	2,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4125 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4125	Core i3-10100Y
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4125) / not specified (Core i3-10100Y). The Celeron J4125 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i3-10100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4125 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.