
Celeron M 743

Core i5-12400F
Celeron M 743 vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron M 743 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron M 743 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron M 743
2009Why buy it
- β Costs $67 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- β Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,324 vs 19,532).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on BGA965, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +536.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 807.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA965 and older memory support.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron M 743.
Trade-offs
- β62.6% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
- β6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron M 743?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron M 743 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 743
The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 743 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F β a 108.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The Celeron M 743 uses the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 743 scores 1,324 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 β a 174.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+238% |
| Base Clock | β | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008β2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,324 | 19,532+1375% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron M 743 uses the BGA965 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA965 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M 743) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron M 743 was priced at $107, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($107 vs $174), Celeron M 743 was $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 743 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F β making the Core i5-12400F the 160.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-39% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 112.3+806% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














