
Celeron M 743

Turion Neo X2 L625
Celeron M 743 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron M 743 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron M 743 vs Turion Neo X2 L625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron M 743
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Turion Neo X2 L625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Turion Neo X2 L625
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,313 vs 1,324).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron M 743 better than Turion Neo X2 L625?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron M 743 vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 743
The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion Neo X2 L625
The Turion Neo X2 L625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,313 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 743 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion Neo X2 L625 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion Neo X2 L625 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion Neo X2 L625 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Turion Neo X2 L625. The Celeron M 743 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 743 scores 1,324 against the Turion Neo X2 L625's 1,313 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron M 743.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Turion Neo X2 L625 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz+23% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Congo (2009) |
| PassMark | 1,324 | 1,313 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron M 743 uses the BGA965 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron M 743 | Turion Neo X2 L625 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA965 | ASB1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















