Celeron N2805 vs Pentium J3710

Intel

Celeron N2805

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.46 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium J3710

4 Cores4 Thrd6.5 WWMax: 2.64 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium J3710 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium J3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium J3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2805

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 4W instead of 7W, a 3W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium J3710 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium J3710

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,420 vs 1,430).
    • 62.5% higher power demand at 6.5W vs 4W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2805 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron N2805 better than Pentium J3710?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium J3710 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron N2805 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2805 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium J3710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron N2805 vs Pentium J3710 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron N2805

    The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

    Intel

    Pentium J3710

    The Pentium J3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.64 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,420 points. Launch price was $161.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron N2805 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 versus 2.64 GHz on the Pentium J3710 — a 57.6% clock advantage for the Pentium J3710 (base: 1.46 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron N2805 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium J3710 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2805 scores 1,430 against the Pentium J3710's 1,420 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N2805. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron N2805Pentium J3710
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    1.46 GHz
    2.64 GHz+81%
    Base Clock
    1.46 GHz
    1.6 GHz+10%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)+25500%
    2 MB
    Process
    22 nm
    14 nm-36%
    Architecture
    Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
    Airmont (2016)
    PassMark
    1,430
    1,420
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

    FeatureCeleron N2805Pentium J3710
    Socket
    FCBGA1170
    FCBGA1170
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    4
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: true (Celeron N2805) / not specified (Pentium J3710). The Celeron N2805 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium J3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.

    FeatureCeleron N2805Pentium J3710
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true