Celeron N2806 vs Celeron N2830

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2806 vs Celeron N2830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2806 vs Celeron N2830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 7W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N2830

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron N2806 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,195).
❌75% higher power demand at 7W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than Celeron N2830?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2830 is ahead with 20.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2806 vs Celeron N2830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2806 and Celeron N2830 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 versus 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Celeron N2830 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). Both are built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N2806 scores 1,195 against the Celeron N2830's 1,185 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron N2806. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Celeron N2830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.41 GHz+21%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.16 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,195	1,185

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Celeron N2830
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	8
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N2806) / true (Celeron N2830). The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Celeron N2806 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.