Celeron N2810
VS
A6-5400B

Celeron N2810 vs A6-5400B

Intel

Celeron N2810

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A6-5400B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2810 is positioned at rank 605 and the A6-5400B is on rank 699, so the Celeron N2810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2810

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#593
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
796%
#594
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
785%
#595
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
720%
#596
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
717%
#597
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
710%
#599
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
686%
#600
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
658%
#601
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
657%
#602
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
639%
#605
Celeron N2810
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5400B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12765%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12061%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2090%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1828%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1047%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1033%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
941%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
941%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
930%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
905%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
893%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
889%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
881%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#699
A6-5400B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
100%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-5400B leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2810 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N2810A6-5400B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2810A6-5400B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2810 and A6-5400B

Intel

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

AMD

A6-5400B

The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2810 and A6-5400B share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B — a 62.1% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron N2810 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-5400B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2810 scores 1,474 against the A6-5400B's 1,465 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N2810. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N2810A6-5400B
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.8 GHz+90%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,474
1,465
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2810 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-5400B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2810 versus DDR3-1866 on the A6-5400B — the Celeron N2810 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5400B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2810) vs 16 (A6-5400B) — the A6-5400B offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2810) and A55,A75,A85X (A6-5400B).

FeatureCeleron N2810A6-5400B
Socket
FCBGA1170
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
8
32 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2810) vs AMD-V (A6-5400B). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2810) and Radeon HD 7540D (A6-5400B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250; A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureCeleron N2810A6-5400B
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Radeon HD 7540D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop