Celeron N2840 vs Pentium Dual Core T4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2840 vs Pentium Dual Core T4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2840 vs Pentium Dual Core T4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2840

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium Dual Core T4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,336).

Pentium Dual Core T4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N2840 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2840 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2840 better than Pentium Dual Core T4500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2840 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4500 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2840 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2840 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T4500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2840 vs Pentium Dual Core T4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2840

The Celeron N2840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual Core T4500

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,336 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.58 GHz on the Celeron N2840 versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N2840 (base: 2.16 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron N2840 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2840 scores 1,331 against the Pentium Dual Core T4500's 1,336 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2840	Pentium Dual Core T4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.58 GHz+12%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	2.3 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,331	1,336
Geekbench 6 Single	230	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	430	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2840 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2840 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — the Celeron N2840 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2840) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4500) — the Celeron N2840 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron N2840	Pentium Dual Core T4500
Socket	FCBGA1170	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333+67%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2840) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4500). The Celeron N2840 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2840 targets Netbook, Pentium Dual Core T4500 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron N2840 rivals AMD A6-6310.