Celeron N2840 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Celeron N2840

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.58 GHz2014

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron N2840

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

1,339

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2840 is positioned at rank 157 and the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is on rank 504, so the Celeron N2840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2840

#42

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A

99%

#145

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

331%

#146

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

326%

#147

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

299%

#148

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

298%

#149

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

295%

#151

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

285%

#152

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

273%

#153

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

273%

#154

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

265%

#157

Celeron N2840

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#158

Core i5-3210M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-58

#158

Core i9-13900H

MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A

100%

#161

Core Ultra 7 268V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $400

98%

#162

Core Ultra 7 256V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $350

97%

#492

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

657%

#493

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

648%

#494

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

595%

#495

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

592%

#496

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

587%

#498

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

566%

#499

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

543%

#500

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

542%

#501

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

528%

#504

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N2840 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron N2840	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Tyler (2007−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron N2840	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N2840 Benchmark Check

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2840 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Celeron N2840

The Celeron N2840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2840 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.58 GHz on the Celeron N2840 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N2840. The Celeron N2840 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2840 scores 1,331 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Celeron N2840	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.58 GHz+36%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,331	1,339
Geekbench 6 Single	230	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	430	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2840) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-58). The Celeron N2840 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2840 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2840 rivals AMD A6-6310.