Celeron N2840 vs Xeon L3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2840 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2840 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2840

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Xeon L3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,338).

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while Celeron N2840 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2840 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L3110 better than Celeron N2840?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N2840 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L3110 is the better buy right now. Xeon L3110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2840 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2840

The Celeron N2840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2840 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N2840 scores 1,331 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon L3110. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2840 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110.

Feature	Celeron N2840	Xeon L3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.58 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	3 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,331	1,338
Geekbench 6 Single	230	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	430	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2840 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2840	Xeon L3110
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2840) / not specified (Xeon L3110). The Celeron N2840 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2840 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2840 rivals AMD A6-6310.