Celeron N2920
VS
Core 2 Duo E8235

Celeron N2920 vs Core 2 Duo E8235

Intel

Celeron N2920

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8235

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron N2920 is positioned at rank #278 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2920

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
97%
#266
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
427%
#267
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
421%
#268
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
386%
#269
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
385%
#270
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
381%
#272
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
368%
#273
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
353%
#274
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
352%
#275
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
343%
#278
Celeron N2920
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E8235 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2920 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N2920Core 2 Duo E8235
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2920Core 2 Duo E8235
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2920 and Core 2 Duo E8235

Intel

Celeron N2920

The Celeron N2920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,030 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8235

The Core 2 Duo E8235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Celeron N2920 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8235 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2920 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8235 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8235 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron N2920 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8235 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2920 scores 1,030 against the Core 2 Duo E8235's 1,020 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N2920.

FeatureCeleron N2920Core 2 Duo E8235
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.8 GHz+51%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
6 MB (total)+1100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,030
1,020
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2920 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8235 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N2920Core 2 Duo E8235
Socket
FCBGA1170
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2920) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8235). The Celeron N2920 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E8235 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2920 rivals AMD A4-6210.

FeatureCeleron N2920Core 2 Duo E8235
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true