Celeron N2920 vs V-Series V105

Celeron N2920 vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2920

4 / 4

1,030

+0.2%

1,028

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2920 vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2920 vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2920

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,030).
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2920 better than V-Series V105?

Yes. Celeron N2920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2920 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2920 vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2920

The Celeron N2920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,030 points. Launch price was $107.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2920 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N2920 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2920 versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 50% clock advantage for the Celeron N2920. The Celeron N2920 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N2920 scores 1,030 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N2920.

Feature	Celeron N2920	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+67%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,030	1,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2920 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2920	V-Series V105
Socket	FCBGA1170	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2920) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Celeron N2920 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2920 rivals AMD A4-6210.