Celeron N2920 vs Pentium N3510

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2920

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium N3510 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,030 vs 1,040).
❌250% higher power demand at 7W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 7W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Celeron N2920 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Celeron N2920?

Yes. Pentium N3510 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is the better buy right now. Pentium N3510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2920

The Celeron N2920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,030 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2920 and Pentium N3510 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2920 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N2920 scores 1,030 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 1% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2920 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	Celeron N2920	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,030	1,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron N2920	Pentium N3510
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2920) / not specified (Pentium N3510). The Celeron N2920 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2920 rivals AMD A4-6210.