Celeron G440 vs Celeron N2920

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs Celeron N2920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs Celeron N2920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Celeron N2920 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.

Celeron N2920

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,030 vs 1,035).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2920 better than Celeron G440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2920 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2920 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (28.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G440 vs Celeron N2920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Celeron N2920

The Celeron N2920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,030 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron N2920 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2920 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2920 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N2920 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2920 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Celeron N2920's 1,030 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G440. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2920.

Feature	Celeron G440	Celeron N2920
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.86 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,035	1,030
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2920 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G440) vs 4 (Celeron N2920) — the Celeron G440 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2920).

Feature	Celeron G440	Celeron N2920
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G440) vs true (Celeron N2920). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G440) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2920) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron N2920 rivals AMD A4-6210.