Celeron N2920 vs Pentium E2220

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium E2220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium E2220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2920

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium E2220 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E2220

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,030).
❌Launch MSRP is still $32 MSRP, while Celeron N2920 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2920 better than Pentium E2220?

Yes. Celeron N2920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2920 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $32 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E2220 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2920 vs Pentium E2220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2920

The Celeron N2920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,030 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E2220

The Pentium E2220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2920 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N2920 scores 1,030 against the Pentium E2220's 1,028 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N2920. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2920 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium E2220.

Feature	Celeron N2920	Pentium E2220
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2.4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,030	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	—	330
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	590

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2920 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E2220 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2920 versus DDR2-800 on the Pentium E2220 — the Celeron N2920 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N2920 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2920) vs 0 (Pentium E2220) — the Celeron N2920 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2920) and G31,G41 (Pentium E2220).

Feature	Celeron N2920	Pentium E2220
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Pentium E2220 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2920) vs None (Pentium E2220). The Celeron N2920 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium E2220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium E2220 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2920 rivals AMD A4-6210.