Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-330E

Intel

Celeron N3060

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.48 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-330E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-330E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-330E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-330E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Delivers 66.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Core i3-330E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-330E

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,260 vs 1,267).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($177 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
    • 483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron N3060 better than Core i3-330E?
    Yes. Celeron N3060 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3060 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron N3060 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3060 comes in $70 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 66.3% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron N3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-330E Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron N3060

    The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

    Intel

    Core i3-330E

    The Core i3-330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $177.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron N3060 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-330E — a 195.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N3060 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron N3060 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-330E uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3060 scores 1,267 against the Core i3-330E's 1,260 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N3060. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3060 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-330E.

    FeatureCeleron N3060Core i3-330E
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.48 GHz+8167%
    0.03 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.13 GHz+33%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB+100%
    512 kB
    Process
    14 nm-56%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Braswell (2015−2016)
    Westmere (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    1,267
    1,260
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron N3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-330E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron N3060Core i3-330E
    Socket
    FCBGA1170
    BGA1288
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    8
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: true (Celeron N3060) / not specified (Core i3-330E). The Celeron N3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Core i3-330E requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.

    FeatureCeleron N3060Core i3-330E
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics 400
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron N3060 was priced at $107, while the Core i3-330E came in at $177. On launch pricing ($107 vs $177), Celeron N3060 was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3060 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-330E — making the Celeron N3060 the 49.8% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron N3060Core i3-330E
    MSRP
    $107-40%
    $177
    Performance per Dollar
    11.8+66%
    7.1
    Release Date
    2016
    2010

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.