Celeron N3060 vs Pentium SU2700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3060 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3060 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 10W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,267 vs 1,268).
❌
7% HIGHER MSRP
$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 10W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3060 better than Pentium SU2700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3060 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3060 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N3060 comes in 7.0% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium SU2700 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3060 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3060

The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3060 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N3060 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 62.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N3060 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron N3060 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3060 scores 1,267 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium SU2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.48 GHz+91%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,267	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Pentium SU2700
Socket	FCBGA1170	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3060) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Celeron N3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Pentium SU2700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 400	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N3060 was priced at $107, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($107 vs $100), Pentium SU2700 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3060 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Pentium SU2700 the 6.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Pentium SU2700
MSRP	$107	$100-7%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	12.7+8%
Release Date	2016	2009

Search Celeron N3060 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.