Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X2 B57

Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X2 B57 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N3060

2 / 2

1,267

+0.6%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,260

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X2 B57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X2 B57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 80W, a 74W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Phenom II X2 B57 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Phenom II X2 B57 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X2 B57

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,260 vs 1,267).
❌1233.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3060 better than Phenom II X2 B57?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X2 B57 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3060 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3060 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3060 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X2 B57 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X2 B57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3060

The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X2 B57

The Phenom II X2 B57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3060 and Phenom II X2 B57 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X2 B57 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 B57 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron N3060 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X2 B57 uses Callisto (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3060 scores 1,267 against the Phenom II X2 B57's 1,260 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N3060. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3060 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X2 B57.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Phenom II X2 B57
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.48 GHz	3.2 GHz+29%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Callisto (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,267	1,260

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X2 B57 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3060	Phenom II X2 B57
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3060) / not specified (Phenom II X2 B57). The Celeron N3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Phenom II X2 B57 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.