
Celeron N3060

Pentium J2900
Celeron N3060 vs Pentium J2900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3060 vs Pentium J2900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N3060 vs Pentium J2900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium J2900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.
Pentium J2900
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3060 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,254 vs 1,267).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N3060 better than Pentium J2900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3060 vs Pentium J2900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3060
The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium J2900
The Pentium J2900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $94.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3060 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium J2900 — a 7% clock advantage for the Pentium J2900 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Celeron N3060 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium J2900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3060 scores 1,267 against the Pentium J2900's 1,254 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N3060. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3060 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Celeron N3060 | Pentium J2900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.48 GHz | 2.66 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.41 GHz+51% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Braswell (2015−2016) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| PassMark | 1,267+1% | 1,254 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Celeron N3060 | Pentium J2900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron N3060) / not specified (Pentium J2900). The Celeron N3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium J2900 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.
| Feature | Celeron N3060 | Pentium J2900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N3060 was priced at $107, while the Pentium J2900 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($107 vs $94), Pentium J2900 was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3060 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 13.3 pts/$ for the Pentium J2900 — making the Pentium J2900 the 11.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N3060 | Pentium J2900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $94-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 13.3+13% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














