Celeron N4000 vs C-60
Celeron N4000
C-60
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000 is positioned at rank 126 and the C-60 is on rank 704, so the Celeron N4000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000
Performance Per Dollar C-60
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+51%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000 and C-60
Celeron N4000
The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.
C-60
The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N4000 and C-60 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 1.33 GHz on the C-60 — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the C-60 uses Ontario (2011−2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the C-60's 1,483 — a 0.7% lead for the C-60. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 0 kB on the C-60.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+95% | 1.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz+10% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-65% | 40 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 1,472 | 1,483 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the C-60 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
The C-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6290), while the Celeron N4000 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 6290 |
Value Analysis
The Celeron N4000 launched at $107 MSRP, while the C-60 debuted at $50. At current prices ($30 vs $20), the C-60 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N4000 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 74.2 pts/$ for the C-60 — making the C-60 the 40.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $50-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.1 | 74.2+51% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron N4000 and C-60
