Celeron N4000C vs A10 Micro-6700T

Celeron N4000C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019

A10 Micro-6700T

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron N4000C

2 / 2

1,430

+0.3%

1,426

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000C is positioned at rank 721 and the A10 Micro-6700T is on rank 724, so the Celeron N4000C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C

#708

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1026%

#709

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1011%

#710

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

928%

#711

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

924%

#712

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

915%

#714

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

884%

#715

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

848%

#716

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

846%

#717

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

823%

#721

Celeron N4000C

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T

#712

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1029%

#713

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1014%

#714

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

931%

#715

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

926%

#716

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

918%

#718

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

886%

#719

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

850%

#720

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

849%

#721

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

826%

#724

A10 Micro-6700T

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4000C (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron N4000C	A10 Micro-6700T
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 Micro-6700T (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron N4000C	A10 Micro-6700T
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N4000C Benchmark Check

A10 Micro-6700T Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000C and A10 Micro-6700T

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A10 Micro-6700T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C versus 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A10 Micro-6700T is built on the Mullins (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4000C scores 1,430 against the A10 Micro-6700T's 1,426 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N4000C.

Feature	Celeron N4000C	A10 Micro-6700T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.2 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	—	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	—	Mullins (2014)
PassMark	1,430	1,426
Geekbench 6 Single	—	250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10 Micro-6700T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N4000C	A10 Micro-6700T
Socket	FCBGA1090	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000C) / AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.