Celeron N4000C
VS
A8-3520M

Celeron N4000C vs A8-3520M

Intel

Celeron N4000C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019
VS
AMD

A8-3520M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000C is positioned at rank 721 and the A8-3520M is on rank 806, so the Celeron N4000C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C

#708
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1026%
#709
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1011%
#710
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
928%
#711
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
924%
#712
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
915%
#714
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
884%
#715
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
848%
#716
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
846%
#717
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
823%
#721
Celeron N4000C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3520M

#794
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1221%
#795
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1204%
#796
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1105%
#797
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1100%
#798
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1090%
#800
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1052%
#801
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1009%
#802
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1007%
#803
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
980%
#806
A8-3520M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4000C (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N4000CA8-3520M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-3520M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N4000CA8-3520M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000C and A8-3520M

Intel

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A8-3520M

The A8-3520M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,441 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3520M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3520M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-3520M — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A8-3520M is built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4000C scores 1,430 against the A8-3520M's 1,441 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-3520M. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C vs 0 kB on the A8-3520M.

FeatureCeleron N4000CA8-3520M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,430
1,441
Geekbench 6 Single
255
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-3520M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4000CA8-3520M
Socket
FCBGA1090
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000C) / AMD-V (A8-3520M). The A8-3520M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3520M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3520M rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCeleron N4000CA8-3520M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop