Celeron N4000C
VS
Celeron 5205U

Celeron N4000C vs Celeron 5205U

Intel

Celeron N4000C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Celeron 5205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000C is positioned at rank 721 and the Celeron 5205U is on rank 1231, so the Celeron N4000C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C

#708
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1026%
#709
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1011%
#710
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
928%
#711
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
924%
#712
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
915%
#714
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
884%
#715
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
848%
#716
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
846%
#717
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
823%
#721
Celeron N4000C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5205U

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
8811%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
8682%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7970%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7934%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
7861%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
7592%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
7279%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
7267%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
7072%
#1230
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
100%
#1231
Celeron 5205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1232
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
84%
#1234
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
71%
#1235
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
64%
#1236
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
62%
#1237
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
61%
#1239
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
55%
#1240
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N4000C leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 5205U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N4000CCeleron 5205U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N4000CCeleron 5205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000C and Celeron 5205U

Intel

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4000C and Celeron 5205U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Celeron 5205U is built on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4000C scores 1,430 against the Celeron 5205U's 1,432 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C vs 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U.

FeatureCeleron N4000CCeleron 5205U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+37%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.9 GHz+73%
L3 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
1,430
1,432
Geekbench 6 Single
385
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 5205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4000CCeleron 5205U
Socket
FCBGA1090
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000C) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.

FeatureCeleron N4000CCeleron 5205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget