Celeron N4000C
VS
Phenom X4 9150e

Celeron N4000C vs Phenom X4 9150e

Intel

Celeron N4000C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Phenom X4 9150e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000C is positioned at rank 721 and the Phenom X4 9150e is on rank 438, so the Phenom X4 9150e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000C

#708
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1026%
#709
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1011%
#710
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
928%
#711
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
924%
#712
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
915%
#714
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
884%
#715
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
848%
#716
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
846%
#717
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
823%
#721
Celeron N4000C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9150e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6553%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6192%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4496%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1354%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1073%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
938%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
538%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
531%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
483%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
483%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
478%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
465%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
458%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
456%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
452%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
99%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
99%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
98%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
97%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
97%
#438
Phenom X4 9150e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
98%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
96%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
95%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
95%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4000C (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N4000CPhenom X4 9150e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9150e (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N4000CPhenom X4 9150e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000C and Phenom X4 9150e

Intel

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Phenom X4 9150e

The Phenom X4 9150e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9150e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9150e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C versus 1.8 GHz on the Phenom X4 9150e — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000C. The Phenom X4 9150e is built on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4000C scores 1,430 against the Phenom X4 9150e's 1,427 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N4000C. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9150e.

FeatureCeleron N4000CPhenom X4 9150e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+44%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,430
1,427
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9150e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4000CPhenom X4 9150e
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0