Celeron N4000C vs Pentium J3710

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4000C vs Pentium J3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4000C vs Pentium J3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4000C

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 7W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium J3710

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,420 vs 1,430).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000C better than Pentium J3710?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium J3710 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000C pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000C still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4000C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4000C vs Pentium J3710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium J3710

The Pentium J3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.64 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,420 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C versus 2.64 GHz on the Pentium J3710 — a 1.5% clock advantage for the Pentium J3710 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium J3710 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4000C scores 1,430 against the Pentium J3710's 1,420 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N4000C. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C vs 0 kB on the Pentium J3710.

Feature	Celeron N4000C	Pentium J3710
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.64 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.6 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	1,430	1,420

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium J3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.