Celeron T1700
Core i5-13400F
Celeron T1700 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron T1700 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron T1700 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron T1700
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $116 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,058 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on PGA478, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +701.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 865.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA478 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌145% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron T1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron T1700 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron T1700
The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1700 scores 1,058 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 183.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron T1700 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.5 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 20 MB (total)+1900% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm-89% |
| Architecture | — | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,058 | 25,029+2266% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T1700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T1700 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T1700) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron T1700 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron T1700 was priced at $80, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($80 vs $196), Celeron T1700 was $116 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T1700 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 162.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron T1700 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-59% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2 | 127.7+867% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron T1700 and Core i5-13400F
