Celeron T3100
VS
Core 2 Duo T9400

Celeron T3100 vs Core 2 Duo T9400

VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3100 is positioned at rank 970 and the Core 2 Duo T9400 is on rank 796, so the Core 2 Duo T9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3100

#958
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1925%
#959
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1897%
#960
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1741%
#961
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1734%
#962
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1718%
#964
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1659%
#965
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1591%
#966
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1588%
#967
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1545%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
100%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
100%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
99%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9400

#784
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1198%
#785
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1180%
#786
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1084%
#787
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1079%
#788
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1069%
#790
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1032%
#791
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
990%
#792
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
988%
#793
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
962%
#796
Core 2 Duo T9400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron T3100 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T9400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 6.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron T3100Core 2 Duo T9400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($62)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron T3100Core 2 Duo T9400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($62)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3100 and Core 2 Duo T9400

Intel

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3100 scores 945 against the Core 2 Duo T9400's 1,004 — a 6.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 320, a 9% lead for the Celeron T3100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9400.

FeatureCeleron T3100Core 2 Duo T9400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.53 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache
6 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
945
1,004+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
350+9%
320
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9400).

FeatureCeleron T3100Core 2 Duo T9400
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron T3100) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9400). Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop, Core 2 Duo T9400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9400 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCeleron T3100Core 2 Duo T9400
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Budget