A6-7000 vs Celeron T3100

A6-7000 vs Celeron T3100 Performance Spectrum

A6-7000

2 / 2

1,002

+6.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron T3100

945

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7000 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7000 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7000

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4 Graphics, while Celeron T3100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Celeron T3100

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (945 vs 1,002).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7000 better than Celeron T3100?

Yes. A6-7000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7000 comes in 61.3% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron T3100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 52.1% better value on paper (15.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7000 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7000

The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7000 is built on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 5.9% lead for the A6-7000.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron T3100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	3 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+16%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1024 kB	—
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	—
PassMark	1,002+6%	945
Geekbench 6 Single	—	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7000 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron T3100 — the A6-7000 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7000 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Celeron T3100). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7000) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the A6-7000 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100).

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron T3100
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+100%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7000) vs None (Celeron T3100). The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron T3100
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R4 Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	None
Target Use	—	Legacy Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-7000 was priced at $100, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($100 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7000 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 41.3% better value option.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron T3100
MSRP	$100	$62-38%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	15.2+52%
Release Date	2014	2008

Search A6-7000 on Amazon

Search Celeron T3100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.