Celeron T3300 vs Athlon II X2 240e
Celeron T3300
Athlon II X2 240e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3300 is positioned at rank 1038 and the Athlon II X2 240e is on rank 941, so the Athlon II X2 240e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+412%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3300 and Athlon II X2 240e
Celeron T3300
The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon II X2 240e
The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 240e is built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3300 scores 1,005 against the Athlon II X2 240e's 1,007 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 240e. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3300 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | — | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,005 | 1,007 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T3300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 240e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3300) / true (Athlon II X2 240e). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Celeron T3300 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 240e debuted at $77. At current prices ($15 vs $77), the Celeron T3300 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3300 delivers 67.0 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 240e — making the Celeron T3300 the 134.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Athlon II X2 240e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $77-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-81% | $77 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.0+411% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron T3300 and Athlon II X2 240e
