Celeron T3300
VS
Celeron J3060

Celeron T3300 vs Celeron J3060

VS
Intel

Celeron J3060

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.48 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3300 is positioned at rank 1038 and the Celeron J3060 is on rank 313, so the Celeron J3060 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300

#1025
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2510%
#1026
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2473%
#1027
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2270%
#1028
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2260%
#1029
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2239%
#1031
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2163%
#1032
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2074%
#1033
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2070%
#1034
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2015%
#1037
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
100%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1041
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3060

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4606%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4353%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3160%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
952%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
754%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
660%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
378%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
373%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
340%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
340%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
336%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
327%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
322%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
321%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
318%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
99%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
99%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
98%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
98%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
98%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
98%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
98%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
98%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
97%
#313
Celeron J3060
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J3060 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron T3300Celeron J3060
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron T3300 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron T3300Celeron J3060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3300 and Celeron J3060

Intel

Celeron T3300

The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Celeron J3060 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3300 scores 1,005 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 1% lead for the Celeron J3060. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3300 vs 0 kB on the Celeron J3060.

FeatureCeleron T3300Celeron J3060
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.48 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
PassMark
1,005
1,015
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
370
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T3300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T3300Celeron J3060
Socket
PGA478
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3300) / VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Celeron T3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.

FeatureCeleron T3300Celeron J3060
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop/NAS