Celeron T3300
VS
Ryzen 5 3600

Celeron T3300 vs Ryzen 5 3600

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron T3300 is positioned at rank #1038 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300

#1025
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2510%
#1026
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2473%
#1027
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2270%
#1028
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2260%
#1029
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2239%
#1031
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2163%
#1032
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2074%
#1033
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2070%
#1034
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2015%
#1037
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
100%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1041
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1410%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1332%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
291%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
116%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
114%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
103%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
99%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
98%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
95%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
93%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
92%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
91%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
91%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
88%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
85%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
85%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
85%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
83%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
83%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 3600 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron T3300 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+230%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3300 and Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Celeron T3300

The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3300 scores 1,005 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 178.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3300 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
1 MB
32 MB (total)+3100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
45 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
1,005
17,685+1660%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T3300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
PGA478
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3300) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron T3300 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. At current prices ($15 vs $80), the Celeron T3300 is $65 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3300 delivers 67.0 pts/$ vs 221.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 107% better value option.

FeatureCeleron T3300Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP
$86-57%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$15-81%
$80
Performance per Dollar
67.0
221.1+230%
Release Date
2010
2019