Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Atom C3338
Core 2 Duo E6750
Atom C3338
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6750 is positioned at rank 1069 and the Atom C3338 is on rank 543, so the Atom C3338 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3338
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Atom C3338
Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.
Atom C3338
The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6750 and Atom C3338 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom C3338 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6750 scores 1,029 against the Atom C3338's 1,028 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750 vs 4 MB on the Atom C3338.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz+21% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+77% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,029 | 1,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom C3338 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs 1 (Atom C3338). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs 10 (Atom C3338) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+33225% | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 128 GB+838860700% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core 2 Duo E6750) / not specified (Atom C3338). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Atom C3338
