Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Atom x5-Z8330

Core 2 Duo E6750

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2007

Atom x5-Z8330

4 Cores4 Thrd−WMax: 1.92 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo E6750

2 / 2

1,029

+0.4%

1,025

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6750 is positioned at rank 1069 and the Atom x5-Z8330 is on rank 778, so the Atom x5-Z8330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

55465%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

52409%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

38053%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

11464%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

9081%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

7944%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

4550%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

4490%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

4089%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

4088%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

4043%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3933%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3878%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3863%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3828%

#1069

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

100%

#1070

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

100%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

96%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

89%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

88%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

85%

#1075

Sempron 3600+

MSRP: $105|Avg: $20

82%

#1076

Celeron 2.80

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

76%

#1077

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

MSRP: $450|Avg: $20

72%

#1078

Athlon 64 3600+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $15

71%

#1079

Core 2 Quad Q6700

MSRP: $530|Avg: $50

70%

#1080

Athlon 64 2600+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

70%

#1081

Celeron 2.20

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

69%

#1082

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

MSRP: $420|Avg: $15

64%

#1083

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

MSRP: $328|Avg: $10

64%

#1084

Core i7-975

MSRP: $999|Avg: $50

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8330

#766

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1145%

#767

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1128%

#768

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1036%

#769

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1031%

#770

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1021%

#772

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

986%

#773

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

946%

#774

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

944%

#775

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

919%

#778

Atom x5-Z8330

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#790

Athlon 64 TF-20

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x5-Z8330 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-RS 1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E6750	Atom x5-Z8330
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6750 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E6750	Atom x5-Z8330
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo E6750 Benchmark Check

Atom x5-Z8330 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Atom x5-Z8330

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

Atom x5-Z8330

The Atom x5-Z8330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR3L-RS 1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E6750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8330 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8330 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8330 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8330 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6750 scores 1,029 against the Atom x5-Z8330's 1,025 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6750	Atom x5-Z8330
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz+39%	1.92 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+85%	1.44 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Conroe (2006−2007)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	1,029	1,025

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8330 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8330). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8330) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 15 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8330).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6750	Atom x5-Z8330
Socket	LGA775	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	1333+44333%	DDR3L-RS 1600
Max RAM Capacity	16	2 GB+13107100%
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16+1500%	1

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core 2 Duo E6750) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8330). The Atom x5-Z8330 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.