Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Celeron 4305U

CPU

GPU

Core 2 Duo E7300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2008

Celeron 4305U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo E7300

2 / 2

1,555

0.0%

1,562

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7300 is positioned at rank 969 and the Celeron 4305U is on rank 109, so the Celeron 4305U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7300

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

26665%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

25196%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

18294%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

5511%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

4366%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

3819%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

2187%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

2159%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1966%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1965%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1943%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1891%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1865%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1857%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1840%

#969

Core 2 Duo E7300

MSRP: $133|Avg: $133

100%

#970

Core i3-540

MSRP: $133|Avg: $5

100%

#972

Phenom II X3 700e

MSRP: $125|Avg: $40

99%

#973

Core i5-760

MSRP: $230|Avg: $61

99%

#974

Core i3-7102E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $80

99%

#975

Core 2 Quad Q8400

MSRP: $183|Avg: $128

97%

#976

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

MSRP: $84|Avg: $5

96%

#977

Pentium E2180

MSRP: $84|Avg: $15

96%

#978

Pentium Dual-Core E2140

MSRP: $74|Avg: $5

94%

#979

Core i7-960

MSRP: $309|Avg: $110

94%

#980

E1-1500

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

94%

#981

Core i5-2405S

MSRP: $309|Avg: $120

94%

#982

Celeron 420

MSRP: $39|Avg: $15

93%

#983

Athlon II X4 615e

MSRP: $186|Avg: $30

93%

#984

Athlon X2 BE-2350

MSRP: $90|Avg: $10

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4305U

#31

Ryzen 5 230

MSRP: $200|Avg: $190

97%

#97

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

282%

#98

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

278%

#99

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

255%

#100

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

254%

#101

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

251%

#103

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

243%

#104

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

233%

#105

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

232%

#106

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

226%

#109

Celeron 4305U

MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A

100%

#110

Celeron J1850

MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A

99%

#114

Core i3-4100M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $99

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4305U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E7300	Celeron 4305U
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)	✅ More affordable ($107)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)	✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E7300 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E7300	Celeron 4305U
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+25%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)	✅ More affordable ($107)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo E7300 Benchmark Check

Celeron 4305U Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7300 and Celeron 4305U

Core 2 Duo E7300

The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.

Celeron 4305U

The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E7300 and Celeron 4305U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 4305U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7300 scores 1,555 against the Celeron 4305U's 1,562 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 4305U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7300 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305U.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7300	Celeron 4305U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz+21%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+21%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+1100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,555	1,562
Geekbench 6 Single	412	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	725	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 4305U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus 2133 on the Celeron 4305U — the Celeron 4305U supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305U supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300) and Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4305U).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7300	Celeron 4305U
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	2133+106550%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+13107100%	64
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300) vs true (Celeron 4305U). The Celeron 4305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron 4305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245; Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U.