Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Celeron J3060

CPU

GPU

Core 2 Duo E8135

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2009

Celeron J3060

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.48 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo E8135

2 / 2

1,020

+0.5%

1,015

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8135 is positioned at rank 1203 and the Celeron J3060 is on rank 313, so the Celeron J3060 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8135

#1191

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

5753%

#1192

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

5669%

#1193

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

5204%

#1194

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

5180%

#1195

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

5133%

#1197

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

4957%

#1198

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

4753%

#1199

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

4745%

#1200

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

4618%

#1203

Core 2 Duo E8135

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

100%

#1204

Core 2 Duo U7700

MSRP: $262|Avg: $10

100%

#1205

Core Duo T2400

MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A

99%

#1206

Core 2 Duo U7600

MSRP: $250|Avg: $5

99%

#1207

Pentium M 735

MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A

97%

#1208

Core i7-620LM

MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A

96%

#1209

Core i7-740QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

95%

#1211

Core 2 Solo SU3300

MSRP: $262|Avg: $50

93%

#1212

Celeron 540

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

93%

#1213

Celeron U3600

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

91%

#1216

Core 2 Quad Q9000

MSRP: $348|Avg: $15

90%

#1217

Core i5-2537M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

90%

#1218

Core i7-720QM

MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3060

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

4606%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

4353%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

3160%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

952%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

754%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

660%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

378%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

373%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

340%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

340%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

336%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

327%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

322%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

321%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

318%

#287

Core Ultra 9 285T

MSRP: $549|Avg: $549

99%

#288

Core i5-12500TE

MSRP: $225|Avg: $225

99%

#289

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

MSRP: $108|Avg: $70

98%

#290

Core i9-10900KF

MSRP: $509|Avg: $336

98%

#291

Core i9-14900T

MSRP: $549|Avg: $577

98%

#292

Core i5-13500T

MSRP: $342|Avg: $342

98%

#293

Core i3-10300

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49

98%

#294

Core i9-10900F

MSRP: $464|Avg: $300

98%

#295

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

MSRP: $449|Avg: $429

97%

#313

Celeron J3060

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#314

Athlon 5150

MSRP: $21|Avg: $21

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J3060 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E8135	Celeron J3060
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E8135 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E8135	Celeron J3060
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo E8135 Benchmark Check

Celeron J3060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8135 and Celeron J3060

Core 2 Duo E8135

The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8135 and Celeron J3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 — a 114.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060 (base: 2.667 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron J3060 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8135 scores 1,020 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8135	Celeron J3060
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.67 GHz	2.48 GHz+270%
Base Clock	2.667 GHz+67%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+500%	1 MB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	1,020	1,015
Geekbench 6 Single	—	200
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	370

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8135	Celeron J3060
Socket	P	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135) / VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.