Core 2 Duo E8135
VS
Core 2 Duo E4700

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core 2 Duo E4700

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8135

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8135 is positioned at rank 1203 and the Core 2 Duo E4700 is on rank 1035, so the Core 2 Duo E4700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8135

#1191
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5753%
#1192
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5669%
#1193
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5204%
#1194
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5180%
#1195
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5133%
#1197
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4957%
#1198
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4753%
#1199
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4745%
#1200
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4618%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
100%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
99%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
99%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
96%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
93%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
91%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
90%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
90%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41015%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38755%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8477%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6715%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5874%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3321%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3023%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3023%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2989%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2909%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2868%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2831%
#1034
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
100%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
100%
#1036
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
100%
#1037
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#1038
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
99%
#1039
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1042
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1043
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
96%
#1044
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1046
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
93%
#1047
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1048
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1049
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E4700 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E8135 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E4700 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($10 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+49%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo E4700

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8135

The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8135 and Core 2 Duo E4700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — a 118% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 2.667 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8135 scores 1,020 against the Core 2 Duo E4700's 1,011 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.67 GHz
2.6 GHz+288%
Base Clock
2.667 GHz+3%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,020
1,011
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
Socket
P
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135) / false (Core 2 Duo E4700). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E8135 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E4700 debuted at $133. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E4700 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8135 delivers 68.0 pts/$ vs 101.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4700 — making the Core 2 Duo E4700 the 39.1% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP
$200
$133-34%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$10-33%
Performance per Dollar
68.0
101.1+49%
Release Date
2009
2008