Core 2 Duo E8435 vs Athlon II Neo K325
Core 2 Duo E8435
Athlon II Neo K325
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8435 is positioned at rank 1152 and the Athlon II Neo K325 is on rank 912, so the Athlon II Neo K325 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K325
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+198%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon II Neo K325
Core 2 Duo E8435
The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.
Athlon II Neo K325
The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon II Neo K325 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 — a 179.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II Neo K325. The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8435 scores 1,104 against the Athlon II Neo K325's 1,111 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 257 vs 736, a 96.5% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 1.3 GHz+1757% |
| Base Clock | 3.067 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+500% | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Geneva (2010) |
| PassMark | 1,104 | 1,111 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 257 | 736+186% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435) and M880G (Athlon II Neo K325).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435) vs AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325). Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Low Power |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E8435 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon II Neo K325 debuted at $60. At current prices ($74 vs $25), the Athlon II Neo K325 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8435 delivers 14.9 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Athlon II Neo K325 — making the Athlon II Neo K325 the 99.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $60-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $74 | $25-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 44.4+198% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon II Neo K325
