Core 2 Duo E8435
VS
Celeron N3350

Core 2 Duo E8435 vs Celeron N3350

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8435

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron N3350

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8435 is positioned at rank 1152 and the Celeron N3350 is on rank 1068, so the Celeron N3350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435

#1140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3986%
#1141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3928%
#1142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3606%
#1143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3590%
#1144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3557%
#1146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3435%
#1147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3293%
#1148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3288%
#1149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3200%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
100%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
98%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
97%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
92%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3350

#1056
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2824%
#1057
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2782%
#1058
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2554%
#1059
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2543%
#1060
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2520%
#1062
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2433%
#1063
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2333%
#1064
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2329%
#1065
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2267%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3350 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($74)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E8435 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+44%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($74)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8435 and Celeron N3350

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8435

The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8435 and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 188.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 3.067 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8435 scores 1,104 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 257 vs 250, a 2.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8435 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
2.4 GHz+3329%
Base Clock
3.067 GHz+179%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+500%
1 MB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,104
1,112
Geekbench 6 Single
257+3%
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo E8435) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the Celeron N3350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435) and SoC (Celeron N3350).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
Socket
P
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
LPDDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop/NUC
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E8435 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Celeron N3350 debuted at $107.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8435Celeron N3350
MSRP
$150
$107-29%
Avg Price (30d)
$74
Release Date
2009
2016