Core 2 Duo E8435 vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Core 2 Duo E8435
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8435 is positioned at rank 1152 and the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is on rank 1094, so the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+267%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Core 2 Duo E8435
The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ — a 186.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 3800+. The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses Manchester (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8435 scores 1,104 against the Athlon 64 X2 3800+'s 1,095 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8435.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 2 GHz+2757% |
| Base Clock | 3.067 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-50% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Manchester (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,104 | 1,095 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 257 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ — the Core 2 Duo E8435 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 3800+).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 3800+).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E8435 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ debuted at $354. At current prices ($74 vs $20), the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is $54 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8435 delivers 14.9 pts/$ vs 54.8 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ — making the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ the 114.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8435 | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-58% | $354 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $74 | $20-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 54.8+268% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2005 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E8435 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+
