Core 2 Duo P7370
VS
A8-3820

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs A8-3820

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A8-3820

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo P7370 is positioned at rank 512 and the A8-3820 is on rank 1032, so the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7370

#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#500
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
670%
#501
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
660%
#502
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
606%
#503
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
603%
#504
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
597%
#506
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
577%
#507
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
553%
#508
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
552%
#509
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
537%
#512
Core 2 Duo P7370
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
40066%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
37859%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
27488%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8281%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6560%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5738%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3287%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3244%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2953%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2953%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2841%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2802%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2790%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2765%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
99%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
100%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
100%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
98%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
98%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
97%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
97%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
97%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
95%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
93%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
92%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-3820 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo P7370A8-3820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo P7370A8-3820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P7370 and A8-3820

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P7370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3820 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus 2.8 GHz on the A8-3820 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the A8-3820 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A8-3820 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7370 scores 2,191 against the A8-3820's 2,178 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370 vs 0 kB on the A8-3820.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370A8-3820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
3 MB+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,191
2,178
Geekbench 6 Single
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A8-3820 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The A8-3820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs 20 (A8-3820) — the A8-3820 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370) and A55,A75 (A8-3820).

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370A8-3820
Socket
PGA478
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs AMD-V (A8-3820). The A8-3820 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370A8-3820
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop