Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core m3-6Y30

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core m3-6Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core m3-6Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core m3-6Y30

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,180 vs 2,191).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P7370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-6Y30 better than Core 2 Duo P7370?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core m3-6Y30 is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core m3-6Y30 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-6Y30 is the better buy right now. Core m3-6Y30 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo P7370 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-6Y30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core m3-6Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P7370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-6Y30's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core m3-6Y30 (base: 2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7370 scores 2,191 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P7370	Core m3-6Y30
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2 GHz+122%	0.9 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,191	2,180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P7370	Core m3-6Y30
Socket	PGA478	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—