Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo P7370

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo P7370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo P7370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Core 2 Duo P7370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 10W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 3W instead of 10W, a 7W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,191 vs 2,193).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3455E better than Core 2 Duo P7370?

Yes. Celeron J3455E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J3455E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3455E still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J3455E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron J3455E (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Core 2 Duo P7370
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	—	3 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,193	2,191
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — the Celeron J3455E supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455E) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) — the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E) and Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370).

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Core 2 Duo P7370
Socket	—	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+125%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.