Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron J3455E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron J3455E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron J3455E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅+21.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (450 vs 548).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (850 vs 948).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930TE better than Celeron J3455E?

Yes. Celeron G3930TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.5% better Geekbench multi-core, and 1.1% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron J3455E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J3455E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E — a 16% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930TE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Celeron J3455E's 2,193 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron G3930TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 450, a 19.6% lead for the Celeron G3930TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 850 (10.9% advantage for the Celeron G3930TE). Both processors carry 2 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron J3455E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+80%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	2,218+1%	2,193
Geekbench 6 Single	548+22%	450
Geekbench 6 Multi	948+12%	850

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930TE) vs 6 (Celeron J3455E) — the Celeron G3930TE offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E).

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron J3455E
Socket	LGA1151	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) and HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.