Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon X5472

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon X5472 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon X5472: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Xeon X5472 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5472 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,243).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5472, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon X5472 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5472

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5472 better than Celeron G3930TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5472 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G3930TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5472 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5472 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5472 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5472 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (52.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon X5472 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon X5472

The Xeon X5472 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,243 points. Launch price was $958.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5472 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5472 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3 GHz on the Xeon X5472 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon X5472 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5472 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Xeon X5472's 2,243 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon X5472. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5472.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon X5472
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	2 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB (total)+1100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,218	2,243+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	548	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5472 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon X5472
Socket	LGA1151	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Xeon X5472). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X5472 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.